Are you having a hard time testing your important testing software projects and applications? Are you looking for a perfect test management tool that can handle most of your technical issues in testing processes? Well, you need specific criteria before you rush to choose a test management tool. The software development and software testing market is flooded with essential tools and techniques. Many businesses are now dependent on 80% of their business operations done by the specific set of tools. Just like you need a knife to cut fruit, similarly, you need a tool to run a software testing process more efficiently.
Organizations must be more cognizant about their testing efforts because the quality of their software products depends heavily upon the way it is tested. And the overall organization’s return on investment, productivity, and customer satisfaction depend upon the quality of their software products and services. Testing is an essential part of a software development life-cycle. So, that’s why it has to be much more efficient than any other stage of the development phase. With the appropriate selection of test management tools, the quality assurance team can prioritize their tasks and could be able to pay attention to the tasks that are more valuable to the organization.
It is important to select the tool that aligns with the business requirements. Here are some of the key elements that must be considered as a criterion for selecting the tool.
Let’s discuss them out;
Customizable test Runs – In software testing, “test run” consists of a set of test cases designed to test specific software, functions, or pending software versions (usually including regression testing). Each test run is usually different. If multiple changes are made to existing functions or new functions are added, the test run may mainly consist of test cases for these functions and other old test cases to ensure that the functions are not damaged.
Simple & quick test execution – One of the headaches organizations encounter is the overhead required to perform test runs in the tool. One of the troubles is unnecessary, and too many clicks. This applies to any software. When performing a test run, Q/A wants to be able to quickly pass the test case and move on.
Reporting – Any quality inspection organization must report the test results. The main difference between development and testing is that the results of testers’ work cannot be displayed. The “products” of quality checks are usually documents, such as error reports and test results.
Integration with issue tracking tools – It can be very useful to be able to integrate with issue tracking tools such as JIRA and Trello. Project management and development teams track releases, development tasks, and BUGS in these tracking tools.
Conclusion
Since a great tool would lead you and your organization to wonder, it is therefore important to select a tool that well aligns with your software and business requirements. Otherwise, the tool would not lead you to achieve your objectives instead failure of a project would-be observed.
Kualitee 